<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Great Non-Sequitur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philosophyonthemesa.com/2009/10/29/the-great-non-sequitur/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philosophyonthemesa.com/2009/10/29/the-great-non-sequitur/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:52:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Good Fight? &#171; Philosophy On The Mesa</title>
		<link>http://philosophyonthemesa.com/2009/10/29/the-great-non-sequitur/#comment-2611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Good Fight? &#171; Philosophy On The Mesa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophyonthemesa.wordpress.com/?p=1691#comment-2611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] religion.  Tags: Karen Armstrong, Richard Dawkins trackback  I meant to post this as a comment to Dwight&#8217;s blog below, but couldn&#8217;t figure out how to insert a picture into the comment. So here is the photo, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] religion.  Tags: Karen Armstrong, Richard Dawkins trackback  I meant to post this as a comment to Dwight&#8217;s blog below, but couldn&#8217;t figure out how to insert a picture into the comment. So here is the photo, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul J. Moloney</title>
		<link>http://philosophyonthemesa.com/2009/10/29/the-great-non-sequitur/#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul J. Moloney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophyonthemesa.wordpress.com/?p=1691#comment-2609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To deny that the non-believer could have no meaning or not enough meaning in their lives would be to undermine some Catholic thinking.  Aquinas drew heavily on Aristotle, among others, and Augustine was inspired by Plato.  If these Catholic thinkers argued against the possibility of the Greeks having any meaning in their lives then their own edifices of thought would have crumbled.  It is not a necessary religious outlook, then, that non-believers have no meaning or enough meaning in their lives.  It seems to be an outlook of those who need someone to look down upon, which does not seem to be a Christian thing to do.  Apparently for some, because God does not make them better than others, they have to make themselves out to be better than others.  A good argument against the existence of God is that God does not put a stop to all the stupid things said about God.  If God cannot speak for God, it would seem there is no God to speak, which would mean there is no God.

It seems also that meaning is derived from knowledge.  I know, in my own life I acquire more meaning through the knowledge of others.  If they can give more my meaning to my life, it must be that they have meaning in their lives.  It does not seem to stand that I acquire more meaning from those who have less meaning.

I would think a lack of meaning comes through ignorance.  An ignorant life is a meaningless life.  If the ignorant have meaningless lives, they seem to give no indication that they mind it (Remember. I ride the city buses).  I am sure most ignorant people are of the opinion that they do lead meaningful lives, but opinion is not knowledge.  These are the people that are willfully ignorant through laziness.  Nonetheless, there is an ignorance with which we are all afflicted.  Intelligent people try to overcome their ignorance through knowledge.  No matter how much we know or strive to know, we remain ignorant to some degree.  Because we cannot know some things, life can seem meaningless at times.  In this sense we do not seem to have any advantage over the willfully ignorant, except that we do mind our ignorance while they do not mind theirs.

If anything is going to lead to more meaning it is knowledge.  We know absolutely that ignorance will never lead to any meaning.  If we give up the pursuit to acquire knowledge then the only alternative is to willfully fall into ignorance, which is to go from bad to worse.  Besides, I do not need another ignorant person on the bus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To deny that the non-believer could have no meaning or not enough meaning in their lives would be to undermine some Catholic thinking.  Aquinas drew heavily on Aristotle, among others, and Augustine was inspired by Plato.  If these Catholic thinkers argued against the possibility of the Greeks having any meaning in their lives then their own edifices of thought would have crumbled.  It is not a necessary religious outlook, then, that non-believers have no meaning or enough meaning in their lives.  It seems to be an outlook of those who need someone to look down upon, which does not seem to be a Christian thing to do.  Apparently for some, because God does not make them better than others, they have to make themselves out to be better than others.  A good argument against the existence of God is that God does not put a stop to all the stupid things said about God.  If God cannot speak for God, it would seem there is no God to speak, which would mean there is no God.</p>
<p>It seems also that meaning is derived from knowledge.  I know, in my own life I acquire more meaning through the knowledge of others.  If they can give more my meaning to my life, it must be that they have meaning in their lives.  It does not seem to stand that I acquire more meaning from those who have less meaning.</p>
<p>I would think a lack of meaning comes through ignorance.  An ignorant life is a meaningless life.  If the ignorant have meaningless lives, they seem to give no indication that they mind it (Remember. I ride the city buses).  I am sure most ignorant people are of the opinion that they do lead meaningful lives, but opinion is not knowledge.  These are the people that are willfully ignorant through laziness.  Nonetheless, there is an ignorance with which we are all afflicted.  Intelligent people try to overcome their ignorance through knowledge.  No matter how much we know or strive to know, we remain ignorant to some degree.  Because we cannot know some things, life can seem meaningless at times.  In this sense we do not seem to have any advantage over the willfully ignorant, except that we do mind our ignorance while they do not mind theirs.</p>
<p>If anything is going to lead to more meaning it is knowledge.  We know absolutely that ignorance will never lead to any meaning.  If we give up the pursuit to acquire knowledge then the only alternative is to willfully fall into ignorance, which is to go from bad to worse.  Besides, I do not need another ignorant person on the bus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

