jump to navigation

Chamber of Horrors October 21, 2010

Posted by Dwight Furrow in Dwight Furrow's Posts, politics.
Tags: ,
trackback

The Chamber of Commerce is your local real estate agent, your insurance agent, the owner of a local restaurant, etc. in every town in the United States. A repository of civic virtue. At least that used to be the case.

Tom Donahue has turned the Chamber into an aggressive special interest, essentially a fund-raising arm of the GOP, that gets a substantial portion of its money from foreign sources.

Last week, ThinkProgress published an exclusive story about the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s foreign fundraising operation. We noted the Chamber raises money from foreign-owned businesses for its 501(c)(6) entity, the same account that finances its unprecedented $75 million dollar partisan attack ad campaign. While the Chamber is notoriously secretive, the thrust of our story involved the disclosure of fundraising documents U.S. Chamber staffers had been distributing to solicit foreign (even state-owned) companies to donate directly to the Chamber’s 501(c)(6).

And most of that money goes straight into GOP attack ads.

The Chamber has promised to spend an unprecedented $75 million to defeat candidates like Jack Conway, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Jerry Brown, Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA), and Rep. Tom Perriello (D-VA). As of Sept. 15th, the Chamber had aired more than 8,000 ads on behalf of GOP Senate candidates alone, according to a study from the Wesleyan Media Project. The Chamber’s spending has dwarfed every other issue group and most political party candidate committee spending. A ThinkProgress investigation has found that the Chamber funds its political attack campaign out of its general account, which solicits foreign funding. And while the Chamber will likely assert it has internal controls, foreign money is fungible, permitting the Chamber to run its unprecedented attack campaign. According to legal experts consulted by ThinkProgress, the Chamber is likely skirting longstanding campaign finance law that bans the involvement of foreign corporations in American elections.

But this foreign influence on our elections is not public knowledge.

Of course, because the Chamber successfully lobbied to kill campaign finance reforms aimed at establishing transparency, the Chamber does not have to reveal any of the funding for its ad campaigns.

Here is Chamber of Commerce lobbyist Bruce Josten, explaining why they keep the names of their donors secret:

Corporations, as I said, have employees, vendors, suppliers, and shareholders of all political stripes. They’re not trying to alienate anybody. They’re looking for representative organizations, such as mine and thousands of others, to be an express organization to advocate for them on their behalf.

As Kevin Drum argues:

Whatever else you can say about the flap over the Chamber’s funding sources, this is a notably unpersuasive argument. Josten is essentially saying that rich corporations want the ability to hound and attack anyone in the political sphere they don’t like, but want to be protected from being hounded and attacked by others. That’s nice work if you can get it, but I don’t think most Americans will be sympathetic. If you want to be in the arena, then you need to be in the arena. Being a corporation doesn’t — and shouldn’t — endow you with a special exemption from being attacked if you take controversial political views.

UPDATE: Chamber CEO Tom Donohue, as usual, puts things more bluntly: “I want to give them all the deniability they need,” he says. And he does.

Those patriotic Americans in the GOP aren’t much concerned about foreign influence when it comes to cash.

book-section-book-cover2 Dwight Furrow is author of

Reviving the Left: The Need to Restore Liberal Values in America

For political commentary by Dwight Furrow visit: www.revivingliberalism.com

About these ads

Comments»

1. John Anngeister - October 23, 2010

The lies are certainly out there.

What do you think, are we watching the MLB’s World Series into November for the first time in history because Fox (and who knows who else?) has desired that the attack ads shall be in as many faces as possible until the last day of the campaign?

This thought came to me this afternoon as I prepared to watch Giants vs. Phils and caught a ridiculous Meg Whitman attack ad against Brown.

I have been wondering about the rationale for the late Series, and haven’t heard a better one. The long waits between stages has been odd. And election day is Nov. 2. Have you heard my new conspiracy theory before this, or am I the paranoid genius originating the thought in this case?

Thanks for writing; I need good reportage to compensate for my current focus away from politics.

2. John Anngeister - October 24, 2010

Correction: the 2009 series went into November, so this puts the planning issue back into 2009. Sorry again to be taking up your bandwidth to mull things over.

Wasn’t there a big meet-up with Koch and Fox guys, big Corporations, right-wing nuts, etc. in 2009 to ‘plan’ the 2010 election? Think Progress has the story – I’ll check it out. What do we know about Bud Selig’s opportunities to schmooze with those guys? I can see it now – “Moving the World Series a tough job even for Koch and friends” :)

I promise not to add to this post without response after this one. But digging dirt on bad guys helps me pass the Sunday afternoon without football.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers

%d bloggers like this: