jump to navigation

Student Loans and the Banks April 13, 2009

Posted by Dwight Furrow in Current Events, Dwight Furrow's Posts, politics.
Tags: , , ,
trackback

Currently, many students who apply for a student loan are directed to a private lender who loans the student the money and collects the interest. The federal government guarantees the loan, if the student should default, so there is no risk to the private lender. The banking industry is therefore subsidized to provide a service that the government could provide for less. Why is there a middleman in this process? The government could make the loan, with no bank involved, and save billions.

This is precisely what the Obama Administration has proposed—a program to make direct loans to students and bypass the banks.

Predictably, conservatives (both Republicans and Democrats) are up in arms, complaining that it is more “big government”. Apparently, it is OK to waste taxpayer’s money as long as private businesses can benefit.

And of course the banking industry and their lobbyists are hard at work trying to pick off enough Democrats to scuttle this proposal. And they may well succeed.

This is why I argue, in Reviving the Left, that traditional, moderate, middle-of-the road liberalism is complicit in the disasters that conservatism has wrought and must be radically revised. Moderate liberals want to give everyone a seat at the table and coddle every interest group, even when the interest being served is plainly wrong and contrary to the public good.

Why do the bankers have any standing at all to govern the administration of student aid?

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Ian Duckles - April 14, 2009

Great Post! Just thought I would pile on by noting that a similar problem arises in health care. As I am sure folks know, the US pays the most per capita for health care, but we rank around 40th among industrialized nations in terms of health outcomes. About 30 cents of every health care dollar is to pay the salary of individuals whose job is to deny people coverage. We could pay half what we pay for health care now, cover every citizen and have better health outcomes.

From this, I conclude that the major impediment to health care reform and the major cost of health care in the US is a direct result of private insurance companies. Despite this fact, these companies and their lobbying representatives have a significant role and seat at the table as the Obama administration tries to reform health care. And so, we come to a revision of the earlier question:

Why do insurance companies have any standing at all to govern the administration of health care?

2. Progress on Student Loan Reform « Philosophy On The Mesa - April 27, 2009

[…] Posts, politics. Tags: bipartisanship, budget reconciliation, student loan reform trackback I argued recently that reforming our bone-headed student loan program may face an uphill battle in congress due to […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: