Will He Fight? January 28, 2010Posted by Dwight Furrow in Dwight Furrow's Posts, politics.
Tags: Obama, State of the Union
I was unfortunately unable to watch Obama’s State of the Union Speech. I will have to watch it tomorrow.
This is a crucial time in his presidency and he needed to be at his best—and the immediate response suggests to be that he was.
But there is a sense in which the speech is inconsequential. I agree with Jonathan Zasloff:
I care what happens over the next few days and weeks.
When the likes of Bayh, Lincoln, Ben Nelson, Landrieu, Holy Joe, and Rahm start saying, “let’s go slow and not try to do too much,” will the President listen to them?
When Congressional leaders ask the President to give them leadership and direction on health care, will he provide it?
When they try to hollow out financial regulation, or destroy the bank tax, will the White House go along?
When Lisa Murkowski tries to attach her egregious rider to an appropriations bill to stop EPA from regulating climate change, will Obama threaten a veto?
When the going gets tough in Washington, will Obama take to the hustings and campaign as if his Presidency and the nation depend upon him winning (because it does)?
Will he fight?
Obama has done a lot of good things—especially the stimulus package which has saved jobs and stabilizing the banking system, which has saved a whole lot of jobs. He has made a few mistakes—but then he has the most difficult job in the world. Who wouldn’t make mistakes?
The question is will he provide the kind of extraordinary leadership we need in this extraordinary time. Or will he succumb to the inside-the-beltway inertia that swallows any good idea and regurgitates it as patronage for oligarchs.
For political commentary by Dwight Furrow visit: www.revivingliberalism.com